Web1 In s 1 of the Act. 2 Various aspects of the prescribed minimum sentence legislation that conduce to potentially arbitrary results have been noted in other judgments; see especially S v Vilakazi [2008] ZASCA 87, 2009 (1) SACR 552 (SCA); 2012 (6) SA 353; [2008] 4 All SA 396, at paras. 11-13. Webin the case of S v Dodo 2001 (1) SACR 594 (CC) and reinforced in the recent case of S v Vilakazi 2009 (1) SACR 552 (SCA). [4] In S v Malgas (supra) at para 25, Marais JA, …

Twenty Years of Constitutional Court Judgments: What …

http://www.saflii.austlii.edu.au/za/cases/ZANWHC/2024/11.html WebIn S v Vilakazi 2009 (1) SACR 552 (SCA) para 58, Nugent JA stated as follows: ‘[i]n cases of serious crime the personal circumstances of the offender, by themselves will … marlboro is owned by

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE …

Webmore than a handful of blunt paragraphs” ( S v Vilakazi 2009 1 SACR 552 (SCA) par 11). It has been much criticised (see for example, Terblanche in Criminal justice in a new … WebS v Vilakazi 2009(1) SACR 552 (SCA) 6. Rammoko v Director of Public Prosecutions 2003(1) SACR 200 (SCA) 7. S v Magida 2005 (2) SACR 591 (SCA) 8. S v Cloete 1995 (1) SACR 367 (W) 9. S v C 1996 (2) SACR 503 (T) 10. Mazibuko v Minister of Correctional Services and Others 2007 (2) SACR 303 (T) 11. Stanfield v Minister of Correctional … Webmore than a handful of blunt paragraphs” ( S v Vilakazi 2009 1 SACR 552 (SCA) par 11). It has been much criticised (see for example, Terblanche in Criminal justice in a new society: Essays in honour of Solly Leeman (eds Burchell & Erasmus) (2003) 194). The legislative scheme provides that the maximum sentence allowed marlboro is in what county nj