Nettet7. jun. 2000 · Lefevers, 10 S.W.3d at 350. It noted that we had previously held that the legislature had intended the phrase “ultimate sex act” to mean more than a general allegation of sexual activity, so that communications making reference to “making sexual advances to little boys” or “molesting little children” did not qualify as ultimate sex acts, … NettetCaselaw Access Project cases. Browse; Reporter S.W.3d Volume 38 38 S.W.3d South Western Reporter Third Series (1993-2024) volume 38.
Gonzales v. State, No. 04-06-00259-CR Casetext Search + Citator
NettetCaselaw Access Project cases. Browse; Reporter S.W.3d Volume 20 20 S.W.3d South Western Reporter Third Series (1993-2024) volume 20. Nettet2. feb. 2011 · The appellant was indicted for the offense of forgery under Section 32.21 of the Texas Penal Code. 1 Because the jury found that the counterfeit writing he passed, a purported store receipt, constituted a "commercial instrument," it convicted him of a state jail felony under Section 32.21(d). 2 The Sixth Court of Appeals found the evidence … permeability sandstone
State v. Stephens, No. PD-1032-20 Casetext Search + Citator
Nettet20 S.W.3d 707 LEFEVERS v. STATE Email Print Comments (0) No. 540-99. View Case; Cited Cases; Citing Case ; Citing Cases . Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case. 65 S.W.3d 38 - THOMAS v ... NettetRead Shipp v. State, 331 S.W.3d 433, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database NettetDocket Nº: 108-00. Citation: 65 S.W.3d 38: Party Name: Jimmy Wayne THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas. Case Date: November 21, 2001: Court: Court of Appeals of ... permeability sand